Calling
Texting
Email
Relational organizing
List builder
Insights
Campaign tools
Run a labor union membership drive
A step-by-step guide to growing your membership.
Read the guide →
Talk to a 10DLC expert
Get compliant and keep your texts delivering.
Get expert help →
Watch our latest webinar
See how campaigns run smarter with CallHub.
Watch now →
Run unified campaigns for better reach
One campaign. Every channel. Automatic.
See how it works →
Industry
Advocacy
Unions
Nonprofit
Political
Partners
Organizations and agencies we work with to help campaigns run smarter.
NationBuilder Democracy Partners PDI
View all →
Pricing

Voter Turnout in Local Elections: Why It Is Low and How to Drive It

Aug 6, 2026 — 15MIN READ

The offices closest to voters often attract the fewest voters. Low voter turnout in local elections is not simply a sign that people do not care. Off-cycle dates, limited information, weak competition, unequal mobilization, and practical voting barriers all narrow the electorate.

A local campaign cannot change every structural condition while an election is underway. It can make the race visible, connect the office to a concrete local stake, identify supporters with room to move, and follow through until each supporter has a workable voting plan.

How low is voter turnout in local elections?

voter turnout local elections benchmarks

Local turnout is often substantially lower than turnout in presidential or other high-salience elections, but there is no single average that applies to every jurisdiction. The useful benchmark is turnout in comparable elections with the same office, calendar, electorate, and voting rules.

BenchmarkWhat the research reportsHow to use it
Municipal electionsTurnout is often below 15%Treat this as a scale indicator, not a forecast
School-board electionsTurnout often falls between 5% and 10%Expect a small electorate, then confirm it locally
Large-city contestsTurnout for mayor and city council was below 15% in 20 of 30 large cities studiedCompare your city with its own prior contests
Local elections overallA recent summary places average turnout around one-quarter of registered votersCheck the denominator and election timing before comparing

These figures come from the Carnegie Corporation’s analysis of municipal and school-board elections and a National Conference of State Legislatures research summary. Both reinforce the same point: Local turnout is low and uneven, but the headline percentage alone does not tell a campaign how many people will vote.

Use the right denominator and comparison election

Turnout can mean ballots cast divided by registered voters, eligible voters, voting-age residents, or active registered voters. Those denominators produce different percentages.

Before adopting any turnout estimate, confirm:

  • Denominator: Which population does the published percentage use?
  • Office: Is the comparison for the same office or a similar local office?
  • Calendar: Was the prior race on-cycle, off-cycle, or a special election?
  • Rules: Were vote-by-mail, early voting, registration, or identification rules comparable?
  • Competition: Was the race contested and visible?
  • Geography: Did district or precinct boundaries change?

Build a comparable-election baseline

Use two or three recent elections that most closely resemble the current race. Do not default to the most recent presidential election because its turnout environment is fundamentally different.

Suppose a city has 40,000 active registered voters. Comparable local elections produced 7,200, 7,800, and 8,100 ballots. A reasonable planning range is 7,500 to 8,200 ballots, adjusted for competition, calendar changes, registration growth, and current voting rules.

The formula is:

Expected turnout = Comparable local turnout × justified adjustment

Document every adjustment. “The race feels energetic” is not an adjustment. A newly competitive contest, a concurrent statewide election, or a major change in voting access may be.

Why is local election voter turnout so low?

Local turnout stays low because several barriers reinforce one another. Timing reduces attention, limited coverage leaves voters unsure what is at stake, and thin mobilization means fewer people receive a direct prompt to act.

CauseWhat it does to turnoutCampaign implication
Off-cycle timingSeparates the race from the high-attention election calendarRepeat the date and voting options early
Low informationLeaves voters unfamiliar with offices, candidates, and consequencesExplain the office through one concrete local decision
Weak competitionReduces urgency and media coverageGive supporters a specific reason their participation matters
Election frequencyCreates fatigue and confusion across repeated contestsUse a simple deadline sequence
Unequal mobilizationConcentrates outreach among habitual votersPrioritize supporters who are less consistent voters
Voting frictionTurns intention into missed deadlines or incomplete plansAsk about method, timing, location, and help needed

For a broader view, see the factors that affect voter turnout.

Off-cycle timing and election frequency

Election timing is a structural driver, not a messaging problem. Research published in the American Political Science Review found that moving local elections to on-cycle November dates generally doubles turnout and produces a more representative electorate. Read the study on election timing and voter composition.

A campaign cannot reschedule an election. It can treat awareness as an early field objective instead of waiting until the final weekend to announce the date.

Low information and perceived stakes

Voters may know that local government affects daily life without knowing which office controls a specific decision. Make the connection explicit:

  • Name the office and the decision it influences.
  • Explain the consequence in local, concrete terms.
  • State the election date and available voting methods.
  • Give the voter one next action.

“Local elections matter” is too broad. “The next council will decide the transit route serving this neighborhood” gives the voter a reason to pay attention.

Competition, mobilization, and voting friction

The same voter can face multiple barriers. A low-information voter may also have an uncertain polling location and no reminder from a trusted organization.

BarrierSignalResponse
AwarenessVoter does not know the date or officeInform before persuading
RelevanceVoter sees no personal stakeConnect the office to one local outcome
ConfidenceVoter lacks reliable election informationRoute them to an official source
LogisticsVoter has no method, time, or location planComplete a voting plan
Follow-throughVoter supports the candidate but has not actedSchedule a specific reminder

Who votes when local turnout is low?

Low-turnout electorates are usually narrower than the communities they represent. Habitual voters, older residents, homeowners, and people with more political information can become overrepresented when participation falls.

Broader communityTypical low-turnout electorate
Includes frequent and infrequent votersSkews toward habitual voters
Includes newer and less-connected residentsRewards people familiar with local institutions
Reflects a wider range of schedules and barriersUnderrepresents people facing greater voting friction
Contains varied levels of political informationSkews toward highly informed voters

The exact composition varies by jurisdiction. Use the voter file and comparable returns to understand your electorate instead of treating demographic tendencies as fixed rules.

Why turnout composition matters to campaign strategy

Uneven turnout changes both representation and campaign incentives. When campaigns repeatedly contact only habitual voters, they can reinforce the same narrow electorate.

The practical response is not to ignore reliable voters. It is to identify supporters among mid- and lower-propensity groups, understand their barriers, and give them enough information and follow-up to participate.

Separate structural causes from campaign levers

voter turnout local elections levers

A strong local plan distinguishes conditions the campaign must accept from behaviors it can change now.

Structural conditionCampaign lever
Off-cycle election dateElection awareness and repeated deadline communication
Number and frequency of contestsSimple, consistent voter education
Registration and voting rulesAccurate guidance and referral to official sources
Media coverageDirect voter contact and community messengers
Baseline political interestLocal relevance and personal stakes
Size of the electorateTargeting, coverage, and follow-up discipline

Structural reform still matters. On-cycle elections can increase participation. During an active race, however, campaign managers need an operating plan for the election that exists.

Calculate the turnout universe and vote goal

Your field plan should begin with a defensible turnout range and win number, then work backward to the supporters and contacts required.

  1. Collect comparable returns: Use the same office and similar election timing where possible.
  2. Estimate a turnout range: Adjust only for documented changes in competition, rules, registration, or concurrent contests.
  3. Set the win number: Divide the expected ballots by two, then add one for a two-candidate race.
  4. Add a planning margin: Account for uncertainty, undecided voters, and imperfect supporter identification.
  5. Build the supporter universe: Include identified supporters and persuadable voters who can realistically move into the turnout pool.
  6. Translate the goal into contacts: Use observed contact and commitment rates, not optimistic assumptions.

For targeting inputs, review how campaigns use voter data to build target universes.

Start with comparable election returns

Prefer elections that match on office, district boundaries, timing, and voting method. Record the reason each election belongs in the comparison set.

Exclude or down-weight a comparison if:

  • A presidential or statewide contest transformed attention.
  • The race was uncontested.
  • District boundaries changed materially.
  • Voting rules changed.
  • A special circumstance made the election unusually visible.

Segment high-, mid-, and low-propensity supporters

Propensity should guide the type and intensity of contact, not decide whether a person deserves outreach.

SegmentPrimary objectiveContact approach
High-propensity supporterConfirm method and timingLight-touch reminder and completion check
Mid-propensity supporterResolve uncertainty and build a planPersonal call or canvass, then reminder
Low-propensity supporterEstablish relevance and remove barriersEarlier conversation, clear local stake, repeated follow-up
Unknown supportIdentify support before GOTVPersuasion or identification program

Convert the win number into daily contact goals

Suppose the campaign needs 4,101 votes and has identified 4,800 supporters. If 3,200 have complete voting plans, the immediate gap is 1,600 supporters without verified plans.

If six contact days remain, divide the unresolved universe by the number of days and available shifts. That creates a daily coverage requirement. Recalculate it each night using actual conversations, completed plans, unreachable voters, and reported votes. For more on running an effective program with a small team and a short timeline, see GOTV for small campaigns.

Build a local-election GOTV strategy that addresses the real barriers

voter turnout local elections workflow

The most effective local strategy moves voters through four stages: Awareness, relevance, planning, and follow-through.

StageVoter questionCampaign action
AwarenessWhat election is happening and when?Repeat the office, date, and voting options
RelevanceWhy should I care about this office?Tie it to a specific local decision
PlanningHow and when will I vote?Confirm method, date, time, and location
Follow-throughWhat could stop me?Resolve barriers and schedule the next contact

Make the election visible before making the ask

Begin awareness work four to six weeks before voting ends. Use consistent language across canvassing, calls, texts, email, and community events so voters repeatedly see the same office, date, and next action.

Do not make every early contact sound like an Election Day alarm. Early messages should orient the voter. Later messages should become more specific and action-focused.

Connect the office to a specific local stake

Build messages with four parts:

  1. Office: Name the position being elected.
  2. Decision: Identify one responsibility of that office.
  3. Local consequence: Explain how the decision affects the voter’s community.
  4. Action: Ask the voter to choose a voting method or date.

Keep factual claims within the campaign’s approved guidance. Refer procedural questions to the official election authority.

Turn support into a concrete voting plan

A support ID is not a completed plan. End a productive GOTV conversation by confirming:

  • Voting method.
  • Planned day and approximate time.
  • Voting location or ballot-return method.
  • Transportation, accessibility, identification, or schedule barriers.
  • Next follow-up date and responsible volunteer.

For the research behind why this single question moves turnout, see the science behind voting plans.

Use personal contact first, then add scalable reminders

Personal conversations do the best work when a voter has questions or barriers. Scalable channels help campaigns cover deadlines and follow up, but they should reinforce rather than replace real contact.

ChannelBest useLimitation
CanvassingPersonal conversation and neighborhood visibilityContact rates and volunteer capacity vary
Volunteer phone bankingBroad coverage, live problem solving, outcome trackingUnknown calls may go unanswered
Peer-to-peer textingOne-to-one reminders and quick repliesRequires disciplined assignment and suppression
Voice broadcastUrgent factual reminders at scaleLimited depth for complex barriers

Canvassing for high-value personal contact

In six US local-election experiments involving 18,933 voters, door-to-door canvassing increased turnout by 2.1 percentage points across the assigned group and 7.1 points among people reached. Contact rates ranged from 14% to 45%, and the Raleigh site showed no significant effect, according to the J-PAL summary of local GOTV field experiments.

Those results do not guarantee a lift. They show why campaigns must measure both assignment and successful contact, then adapt to local execution.

Volunteer phone banking for coverage and problem solving

Volunteer calls can cover voters a canvass team cannot reach and give people space to ask questions. Research summarized in CallHub’s guide to GOTV tools and tactics reports a 3.8-point turnout increase from volunteer-led phone banks, compared with less than one point from commercial phone banks.

Use a conversational script, record outcomes immediately, and route unresolved questions to trained staff.

Text and voice reminders for deadlines and logistics

After a conversation, use reminders to reinforce the plan:

  1. Send the agreed reminder close to the voter’s planned action.
  2. Include one deadline or logistical detail per message.
  3. Provide a route for questions.
  4. Stop routine reminders when reliable data shows completion.

Coordinate handoffs and suppress completed voters

CallHub can support calls, peer-to-peer texts, mass texts, and voice broadcasts in one unified outreach platform for political campaigns. Whatever system you use, every voter needs one current owner and one next action.

Suppress completed voters where reliable data permits. Return unworked contacts to a shared queue after a defined deadline. Preserve conversation outcomes so the next volunteer does not ask the voter to repeat information.

Run the final local GOTV calendar

A local campaign should start before the final weekend. Each phase narrows the universe and makes the next action more concrete, mirroring the same week-by-week structure covered in GOTV timeline: what to do and when.

Four to six weeks out: Identify and inform

  • Confirm the turnout range and win number.
  • Clean and segment the voter universe.
  • Begin support identification.
  • Make the office, stakes, election date, and voting methods visible.
  • Recruit and train volunteers.

Early voting: Build and verify vote plans

  • Ask supporters how and when they plan to vote.
  • Resolve location, ballot, accessibility, and scheduling questions.
  • Record commitments and next actions.
  • Reassign unworked contacts.
  • Begin suppressing reliably completed voters.

Final weekend: Resolve barriers and reassign contacts

  • Prioritize supporters without complete plans.
  • Escalate unresolved factual or logistical questions.
  • Move stale assignments back into active queues.
  • Use reminders to reinforce completed conversations.
  • Review progress at the end of every shift.

Election Day: Focus on unresolved supporters

  • Start with supporters whose plans are incomplete or unverified.
  • Update the queue as completion data arrives.
  • Match urgent barriers with trained staff.
  • Keep scripts short and specific.
  • Stop contacting voters once reliable completion is recorded.

The broader complete get-out-the-vote process can help teams connect this calendar to their full campaign plan.

Measure coverage, movement, and turnout

voter turnout local elections measurement

A useful dashboard separates activity from voter movement. Attempts show effort. Conversations, plans, resolved barriers, and turnout show progress.

Funnel stageMetricWhat it proves
AssignedVoters allocated to a channel or volunteerPlanned coverage
AttemptedCalls, doors, or messages attemptedActivity
ContactedTwo-way conversations completedActual reach
CommittedSupporters who intend to voteStated intention
PlannedSupporters with method, timing, and logisticsReadiness
CompletedSupporters reliably reported as votedAction
ValidatedTurnout confirmed after the electionOutcome

Separate activity metrics from voter outcomes

Do not report attempts as contacts. The J-PAL experiments found contact rates from 14% to 45%, which explains why assigned-group effects differ from effects among reached voters.

Track contact rate by channel, shift, volunteer, precinct, and segment. A high attempt count with a low conversation rate calls for a different intervention than a high conversation rate with few completed plans.

Compare results with the right baseline

After the election:

  • Compare turnout with the range built from comparable local contests.
  • Compare precincts or segments only when their starting conditions are reasonably similar.
  • Separate observed turnout from self-reported completion.
  • Record contact, plan, and completion rates by channel.
  • Preserve lessons about timing, scripts, barriers, and volunteer performance.

Turn a small electorate into a manageable field plan

Low local turnout is shaped by structural conditions, but it is not beyond a campaign’s influence. Make the election visible, connect it to local stakes, target supporters with room to move, and use personal follow-up to complete voting plans.

Local races follow the same core GOTV logic as any other race, just compressed into a smaller electorate — see the complete guide to GOTV for the full phase-by-phase system this plan is built on.

For coordinated execution, explore coordinated outreach tools for local political campaigns.

For the full workflow, see how to plan and run a focused local-election GOTV campaign.

Frequently asked questions

What is the average voter turnout in local elections?

There is no universal average that fits every local race. Municipal turnout is often below 15%, school-board turnout often falls between 5% and 10%, and one recent summary places average US local turnout around one-quarter of registered voters. Use comparable local returns with the same denominator and timing to forecast your race.

Why is voter turnout so low in local elections?

Local turnout is low because off-cycle timing, limited information, weak competition, election frequency, unequal mobilization, and voting friction reinforce one another. A campaign should separate structural causes from the barriers it can address through awareness, relevance, personal contact, and vote planning.

How can voter turnout in local elections be increased?

Campaigns can increase participation by publicizing the election early, connecting the office to a concrete local consequence, prioritizing supporters with room to move, and completing personal voting plans. Use research-backed GOTV tools and tactics to coordinate the channels.

Does election timing affect local voter turnout?

Yes. Research indicates that on-cycle November local elections generally produce substantially higher and more representative turnout than stand-alone contests. Campaigns cannot change the date mid-race, so they must compensate with earlier awareness and repeated deadline communication.

How can a school-board campaign improve turnout?

A school-board campaign should explain which decisions the board controls, use comparable school-board returns to set its vote goal, and contact identified supporters early enough to resolve practical barriers. A small electorate makes assignment, follow-up, and accurate completion tracking especially important.

What can a campaign do if it starts GOTV late?

Narrow the universe to identified supporters without verified voting plans. Prioritize live conversations, resolve urgent barriers, assign one owner per voter, and use reminders only after a plan exists. Do not spend the final hours repeatedly contacting voters who have already completed voting.

Shiksha Sharma Linkedin
Shiksha Sharma is a Content Marketer with over 5 years of experience in the B2B SaaS industry. She has extensively written about software that helps organizations work easily. Her areas of research include politics, nonprofits, advocacy, and business.

Latest Articles

View All →
Political Lobbying: How It Works And All You Need To Know

Political Lobbying: How It Works And All You Need To Know

Advocacy

Political Lobbying: How It Works And All You Need To Know

In 2005, six national sales directors for Mary Kay drove pink Cadillacs to the steps of the US Capitol. They...

GOTV Calling and Texting Compliance: What Campaigns Need to Know

GOTV Calling and Texting Compliance: What Campaigns Need to Know

Get Out The Vote

GOTV Calling and Texting Compliance: What Campaigns Need to Know

[et_pb_section][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type="4_4"][et_pb_text] In January 2024, tens of thousands of New Hampshire voters got a call that sounded exactly like Joe...

GOTV Events and Voter Rallies: How to Use Events to Drive Turnout

GOTV Events and Voter Rallies: How to Use Events to Drive Turnout

Get Out The Vote

GOTV Events and Voter Rallies: How to Use Events to Drive Turnout

GOTV events, the rallies, phone bank parties, and canvass launches that show up in nearly every campaign strategy guide, get...

Newsletter

Stay updated with latest trends and news

Get practical insights to fundraise smarter, organize better, and run more effective campaigns.

Your details could not be saved. Please try again.
You have been subscribed.